In a statement released October 4, the utility addressed the storm that affected 375,000 of its approximately 496,000 customers, acknowledging the difficulties many experienced during the restoration effort.
According to NIPSCO, weather forecasts underestimated the storm’s strength, leaving the company without enough time to bring in additional crews and contractors beyond its initial preparations before winds intensified to more than 100 mph.
The company compared wind speeds in some areas to those of a Category 2 or Category 3 hurricane.
NIPSCO said the storm uprooted thousands of large trees and damaged critical infrastructure throughout the region.
As the extent of the damage became clear, the company expanded its response. More than 1,800 workers and contractors were mobilized within the first 24 hours.
Ultimately, more than 4,000 workers from 15 states participated in what NIPSCO described as the largest restoration effort in its history.
The utility said crews faced challenges including impassable roads, additional storms and the need to replace damaged equipment.
NIPSCO Acknowledges Communication Mistake
While addressing the restoration process, NIPSCO also acknowledged that some communities were left off its list of estimated restoration times.
The company said it was waiting for substantiated timelines before providing estimates to those areas.
NIPSCO maintained that the omission did not affect the actual restoration work but acknowledged the frustration it caused customers.
The company also recognized that some customers were without electricity for extended periods.
Independent Review Announced
NIPSCO says it has hired an independent third-party expert to examine its storm response and has committed to making the findings public.
The utility plans to use the review to identify changes in its operations, storm preparations and future restoration efforts.
“We will do better,” the company said in its statement.
NIPSCO also emphasized the importance of strengthening its infrastructure to withstand increasingly severe storms.
The company said those improvements will require discussions with customers, regulators, community officials and first responders to determine how to balance system reliability, risk and affordability.
NIPSCO did not identify the independent expert conducting the review or provide a timeline for when the findings would be released.